HOAX ......... !!

Hi all,
this is after a long sabbatical......(nothing new yeah)
well, this post is in response to the blog http://oxy-i-gen.blogspot.com/2010/03/sixth-great-extinction-event-end-is.html
i have been reading reports and seeing ads on saving tigers....saving monkeys...saving trees....going green...etc etc...
my observations of those are as follows.
1. Money spent on advertisements, franchise products is quite HUGE....i dont have published reports to substantiate the facts...but man, the ad on ' save tigers' appears not less than 15 times during a IPL match....hmm....ppl...money spent on creating awareness is good..but, so much money being spent is??? ...i dont know....?????
i strongly belive all these 'save' programes are more to show the softer side of the company ...which inturn is used for their professional motives......i dont think ' aircel ' has any noble motive to save tigers.......
2. There are bigger problems in the world than saving tigers....it is been estimated that, 1 person per 3.2 seconds dies of hunger......which means by the time you finish reading this line...someone had already died out of hunger............what do we say on that??...
some of the hard facts which still disturbs me more than these are.........
a. In the Asian, African and Latin American countries, well over 500 million people are living in what the World Bank has called "absolute poverty"
b. Every year 15 million children die of hunger
c. India's official poverty level, on the other hand, is split according to rural vs. urban thresholds. For urban dwellers, the poverty line is defined as living on less than 538.60 rupees (approximately USD $12) per month, whereas for rural dwellers, it is defined as living on less than 356.35 rupees per month (approximately USD $7.50). By this measure, only 27.5% of Indians live in poverty, whereas by the World Bank standard of $1.25 per day, 42% of Indians live in poverty - this is the third highest rate in South Asia after Bangladesh and Bhutan.
Source: http://library.thinkquest.org/C002291/high/present/stats.htm & Wikipedia
d. etc etc etc........................
3. well....with all due respects to the vanishing species.......WE CARE FOR YOU..... but, i also request the readers to understand and prioritize their concerns ...
4. It is also law of nature for some species going extint....do we/ our children worry about the extinct dinosaurs...WE DONT........am sure, nature has its cycle....and in every species, there are additions and subtractions........its just complex mathematics
5. Global warming....i still strongly believe its a BIG HOAX.....i can understand summer being hotter/ changes in climate/weather etc etc etc.......well, for all informed readers am sure, u should be aware that, these have been happening for quite a long time....the reports of the climate summit @ copen heagan has been found erronous....
i do accept that the there are adverse effects on the nature due to the raising global temperature (??)...Pl. read this report for more light in the tunnel http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Global_warming_conspiracy_theory
6. Point here is....India, being a developing country has bigger issues to address (hunger, education, infrastructure, agriculture, etc etc)...has to FOCUS on those specific issues first...and let the Developed world take the bigger pie for 'Conserving Nature', as they are the ones who have any way spoilt them....
The conclusions are as follows
1. Think Locally....act globally (what we are doing is reverse)
2. lets be concerned to each other first....and then be concerned on other 'things'
3. I dont understand....when we have a 'patient' in-house, we go out-of-way to save our things and let loose the one in-house.........!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
4. let's RE-THINK..... and lets be rational............!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
regards,
Gnaneswaran.M.G.

13 Comments:
அண்ணன் !! நான் உலக வெப்பமயமாதலைப் பற்றிப் படிக்கும்பொழுதெல்லாம் நீங்கள் சொல்லி இருக்கும் கருத்துகள் மனதில் எழும். முதலாளித்துவ உலகம் தன்னை ‘நல்லவனாக' காட்டிக்கொள்ள எடுக்கும் முயற்சிகளோ எனத்தோன்றும். அனைத்துமே ஒரு வட்டம் என்பது போல , இந்த வெப்பமயமாதலும் இயற்கையின் ஒரு அங்கம் தான். அனாவசிய விளம்பரங்களுக்குப் பணம் செலவழிக்காமல் வறுமைக்கோட்டிற்கு கீழே இருக்கும் மக்களைக் காப்பாற்றினாலே எல்லாம் நலமாக அமையும்.
பண்புடன்
வினையூக்கி செல்வா
/// lets be concerned to each other first....and then be concerned on other 'things'//
well said ,
i go with u !!!
Thanx Selva (Vinaiooki) and Rohini Siva for your comments....
Reiterating the fact..lets first be humans and then clebrate humanity
Ads are fad, I agree.
How is the heat in Chennai ? Saw a picture of a small, unsheltered street girl (in Chennai) standing under a thin line of water from street pipe to escape sun burns.
Did u see the number of people and animals dying of sunburns in Kerala and Tamil Nadu regions ?
Yes we have no dearth of issues to precipitate - But as architect planners, I think construction sector's insensitivity is what we have to bring to focus on.
lks.....agreed, the world is becoming hotter....but, i still strongly believe it is a natural phenomenon ...
and reg the insensitivity in construction sector is just the tip if ice burg....what we design as green buildings concentrate only on reducing the air-con loads and the one which reduces the max, get a great rating.
... as architect-planners, is this what we want??.....what we need are SUSTAINABLE practices....we have to dig our past for most sustainable answers and customize it...who has time for all these??
// we have to dig our past for most sustainable answers and customize it... //
Agreed
this is mainly a response to points 4, 5 n 6 of ur observations...
I read the original blog - on the sixth greatest extinction event - to which yours was a response. The extinction of species, or the loss of bio-diversity in other words, is a planetary boundary which we have overshot the most among the nine main planetary boundaries for safe operation of human activities. (http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v461/n7263/full/461472a.html)
Global warming which is only a small part of climate change, is identified as the third most overshot planetary boundary, the second being nitrogen cycle, a biogeochemical flow boundary. Some of the other boundaries that we are fast approaching the limits of are freshwater use, land system change, ocean acidification etc.
there is now ample evidence and a consensus in the scientific community that the climate change happening now is anthropogenic. Climate science being a very complex system, there is no one single proof that it is anthropogenic or not. Evidence has been collected for over a century and from thousands of sources. Below are a few links on it.
http://www.realclimate.org/index.php/archives/2007/05/start-here/
http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn11462
http://www.350.org/about/science
Some of these links also deal with issue of conspiracy theory. As for the 'climate gate' scandal (erroneous copenhagen reports, leaked emails, etc)... here is a take on the so called scandal:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2010/feb/01/climate-emails-sceptics
what i'm saying is that we need to have a look at the larger picture and not come to quick conclusions based on a few things... but given the complexity of climate science, it is no mean task... one can spend a lifetime studying it...
i fully agree that the developed world needs to do the most in terms of cutting down emissions and reducing the magnitude of climate change... what you perhaps refer to as 'conserving nature'...
i personally feel 'conserving nature' is a very inappropriate term... for let us make no mistake, nature can perfectly survive without us and not the other way round. it is about us. saving ourselves. our childrens future and theirs.
i understand and agree that as a developing country we have other pressing issues such as hunger, education, agriculture, etc. But let us not forget that everything is interconnected... and we are just a small part of a limited eco-system... part of the limited bio-sphere... and our survival is absolutely dependent on it...
in the pursuit of 'development', i'm afraid we are only trying to ape the west, which may not be very wise... for development in the west is based on the capitalist notion of accumulation of unlimited wealth and consumption, which is impossible in a finite world, for material wealth is ultimately based on natural resources and natural resources are limited ("Limits to Growth - The 30 Year Update" by Meadows is a good read on the subject)
(here are two nice videos on the concept of unlimited wealth and consumption and the interconnectedness in everything: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bqz3R1NpXzM http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gLBE5QAYXp8)
now dont get me wrong. i am not against development. but i am not for development of the western kind either. there are better and more sensible ways of doing things. exactly as you say, we do need more sustainable practices... and to dig it out from the past we need a slower pace of life... we need to change our value system... from one of consumerism, competition, efficiency, etc to one of equity, sharing and concern for each other... first and foremost we need to acknowledge that we are living on a finite planet, and anything and everything we do has an impact. so we need to be mindful of how we do things. not out of concern for nature, but for ourselves. for its our own future and survival that is at stake.
just a small, may be even trivial note that i forgot to add on global warming and natural systems... as i said the natural climatic system is extremely complex and erratic (massive fluctuations are part of the process)... but had we not contributed to global warming by pumping all that co2 into the atmosphere over the last century (thanks to the industrial revolution, WW-II nd all that), we would probably have been well underway into the next iceage by now... (http://210.193.216.98/cps/rde/papp/techAdvice:techAdvice/http://www.pnas.org/content/105/36/13252.full)
sorry... here's the link that i meant to give on the erroneous IPCC report at copenhagen... if this is what you were referring to...
http://www.realclimate.org/index.php/archives/2010/02/ipcc-errors-facts-and-spin/#more-2832
the other link was w.r.t the leaked emails scandal...
Thanx anonymous for the detailed review....
i fully well agree with your point of you...and appreciate your efforts to elaborate beautifully into the insights
The points expressed in my blog are 'my concerns on misplaced priorities'....we tend to go gungho about things which are not in our control...and mainly, which gets maximum publicity with minimal impact...
sustainable practices are the most overused words which in my view, cannot be a global solution....for instance, the glass building concept evoloved in west to conserve heat...and we blindly use it to 'ape the west' not understanding the immediate ecological effect....and then...we apply green building concepts....cover tress in front...recycle water and do all superficial things and get credited for 'going green'...doesn't is sound ' hyper superficial '
Instead...our focus should be in developing 'localised', 'customizable' models, which can be ADOPTED..
:)Gnans,
http://scienceblogs.com/illconsidered/2008/07/how_to_talk_to_a_sceptic.php
And THNX Anonymous :)
lks...the link you recommended is indeed very intresting...
but my bigger point is....am not going into the scientific debate of global warming etc etc..
my point is
1. Whoever has done the damage should rectify it.
2. The rectification process SHOULD happen...but, why should be poor suffer..?
3. Saving environment should not become a advertisement tag line(which it is now)..
solid..independent..native...customizable research should gain ground...
etc
etc
Dear Gnans,
Thanks for not debating on climate change. But sorry tom tell you, it doesnt happen that way. By saying that we are not the ones responsible, so we are not to be part of the solution is not a great approach. Thats the global blunder that is holding everything back.
The problem is ours to face! We are the most evoloved of earth's life forms - "the human race". We need to face it once and for all, TOGETHER. Not under the banner or "developing" "developed" etc.
If you think about it, the most bogus of everything is our classification as "developed" and "developing" - Who decides? Basis ? And can such barriers be over emphasised, when we are facing a problem ?
It is good to remember 26 December 2004 - when TSunami hit, it did not spare INDIA!
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
Links to this post:
Create a Link
<< Home